Logo
Home
>
Market Analysis
>
Quantitative easing wind-down affects equity multiples

Quantitative easing wind-down affects equity multiples

09/22/2025
Matheus Moraes
Quantitative easing wind-down affects equity multiples

The gradual reversal of ultra-easy monetary policy is reshaping how investors value equities around the world. As central banks pull back liquidity, market dynamics shift and valuation multiples adjust.

Historical context of QE and QT

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, major central banks launched quantitative easing wind-down programs to stabilize markets. The Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and others expanded their balance sheets dramatically, purchasing government bonds and mortgage-backed securities.

These injections of cash supported lending, fueled expansion and drove asset prices—especially equities—to record highs. When conditions improved, policymakers faced the complex task of withdrawing liquidity from the system without triggering market chaos.

Mechanics of QE and QT

Central bank balance sheet policy operates through clear yet powerful channels.

  • QE Implementation: Purchases of government and private securities increase the money supply and lower yields, boosting asset prices.
  • QT Implementation: Allowing securities to mature without reinvestment reduces central bank holdings and drains liquidity.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, QE peaked: the Bank of Canada’s settlement balances hit roughly $395 billion, while the Fed’s balance sheet exceeded $8 trillion. By January 2025, Canada’s balances fell to $130 billion as QT progressed.

Transmission channels to equity multiples

Equity valuation is sensitive to interest rates and liquidity conditions. Key mechanisms include:

  • Higher equity risk premium: When risk-free yields rise, investors demand a larger spread for stocks, compressing price-to-earnings multiples.
  • Discounted cash flows: Increased discount rates reduce the present value of future earnings, lowering intrinsic valuations.
  • Relative valuation: As bond yields become more attractive, equities lose comparative appeal and trade at lower multiples.

Empirical evidence and case studies

Past QT episodes offer mixed lessons. From 2017 to 2019, the Fed’s balance sheet run-off coincided with market volatility and a modest decline in equity valuation multiples. Confounding factors like trade tensions and global growth slowdowns complicate definitive analysis.

In the 2022–2025 period, central banks imposed caps on reinvestment: the Fed stopped rolling over up to $60 billion in Treasuries and $35 billion in mortgage-backed securities monthly starting in September 2022.

Throughout this phase, the S&P 500 experienced bouts of volatility, with drawdowns of up to 10% as QT advanced. Yet strong corporate earnings and supportive fiscal measures occasionally offset valuation pressures.

Current QT episode: 2022–2025

Today’s QT differs in scale and context. With global inflation still above targets and GDP growth moderating—U.S. Q3 2024 GDP rose by 3.1% annualized—central banks face trade-offs between price stability and financial stability.

The Fed signaled a less aggressive easing stance in early 2025, combining modest rate cuts with continued balance sheet reduction. These moves coincided with a plateau in equity multiples, as investors recalibrated expectations.

Uncertainties and policy signals

Despite historical precedents, the precise impact of QT remains elusive. Fed officials, including Chair Jerome Powell, stress the uncertain market dynamics that can arise when shrinking the central bank balance sheet.

Forward guidance plays a pivotal role: clear communication can temper market spikes in volatility, while ambiguous signals may exacerbate swings in equity prices and P/E ratios.

Global perspective

Regional differences shape the QT experience. Canada’s shorter asset maturities allowed a quicker pace, while Europe and Japan—still grappling with lower long-term yields—move more cautiously. Comparative timelines yield insights into how local markets respond to adjustments in central bank policy.

Investor sentiment in emerging markets also reacts to advanced economy QT, as capital often flows toward higher-yielding assets when developed markets compress liquidity.

Conclusion

The unfolding wind-down of quantitative easing is a defining theme for global equity markets. As liquidity recedes, central bank balance sheet policies will continue to shape valuation environments and investor strategies.

Understanding the mechanics, watching policy signals and acknowledging uncertainties are essential for navigating this complex landscape. While rising yields may compress multiples, strong earnings and careful communication from policymakers can mitigate excessive market swings.

For investors, balancing risk and return in this era requires a deep appreciation of monetary policy’s evolving role. By staying informed and flexible, one can position portfolios to thrive amid the ongoing transformation of global financial markets.

Matheus Moraes

About the Author: Matheus Moraes

Matheus Moraes